Research

Which Agencies and Tech Services Does AI Recommend?

Small providers' own sites take 53% of citations across 4 niches and 2 markets, and established vendors take 37%. That is 26 questions in total.

Niches and markets

6

Questions asked

26

First-party share

53%

Third-party share

4%

Entry bar range

32 to 95

Markets mostly third-party

2 of 2

Niches in this category

NicheDepthCitationsFirst-partyThird-partyBarMedian siteCited examples
Mobile app development agencies4 questions, directional6134%16%9564i4software.com, upcode.com, businessofapps.com, clutch.co
WordPress maintenance services4 questions, directional6130%0%6861eseospace.com, wpbuffs.com, prontomarketing.com
Penetration testing firms4 questions, directional5971%0%3743underdefense.com, defendify.com, synack.com
Fractional CTO services4 questions, directional6175%0%3538kore1.com, fractionaljobs.io, mentorcruise.com
Salesforce consultancies30 questions, own study41150%1%2846

Each niche has 4 questions, so rows are directional. Salesforce consultancies has its own study.

Who gets cited

Small providers' own sites take 53% of citations. Established vendors and marketplaces take 37%, forums and social take 7%, and third-party sources take 4%, mostly review sites such as clutch.co.

Both agency markets in the market study are mostly third-party content: 2 of 2 have a content share of 80 percent or more. Directories such as agencies.semrush.com and themanifest.com get cited there.

TypeShare of citationsCited examples
Small providers' own sites53%underdefense.com (4 of 16), defendify.com (3 of 16), kore1.com (3 of 16), fractionaljobs.io (2 of 16), gofractional.com (2 of 16)
Established vendors and marketplaces37%prontomarketing.com (4 of 16), elementor.com (3 of 16), mentorcruise.com (3 of 16), inspirable.com (2 of 16), synack.com (2 of 16)
Review sites4%clutch.co (2 of 16), goodfirms.co (1 of 16)
Forums and social7%reddit.com (11 of 16), quora.com (2 of 16), facebook.com (1 of 16), instagram.com (1 of 16), linkedin.com (1 of 16)

First-party and third-party citations by question type

Pooled, own-site share is 44% on general questions and 62% on specific ones. ChatGPT shows 53% against 79%, and Google shows 37% against 53%. The share is higher on specific questions than on general ones.

Question typeQuestionsCitationsFirst-partyThird-partyChatGPT first-partyGoogle organic first-party
General812844%8%53%37%
Specific811462%0%79%53%
Both engines1624253%4%64%45%

What to do first

  • Write pages for the specific cases. Own-site share is 62% on specific questions.
  • Complete your directory and review profiles (clutch.co) for the markets where the directory gets the citation.
  • Show up in Reddit and Quora threads (reddit.com, quora.com).
  • Check which of your pages the engines already cite.

Own pages get cited here, so the next step is to score a page with the free AEO checker on how easily an engine can quote it.

Markets from the 14-market study

Meta ads agencies, Australia

Median site

43

Bar

32

Content share

100%

Tested site

25

Editorial verdict, as of 2026-10-02: Contested. The median cited site scores 43 and the bar is 32. Content share is 100%. The engines treated the country as a topic, so a local agency is measured against national content.

Content share is the share of cited sources that were articles about the category (100% here), and a vendor's own page does not count. A tested site scored 25 against a bar of 32. It cleared the bar on 0 of 5 questions, and on 4 of 5 questions a site below the bar was cited anyway.

Get listed and reviewed in the agency directories the engines quote. In this market the directory page gets the citation.

100 domains were cited across the 5 questions; these are the most-cited, each with one page the engines read.

DomainCited onScoreTypeA page they cited
revenuebase.ai4 of 532Articlerevenuebase.ai/companies/meta-ads-agencies/australia
youtube.com3 of 5100Articleyoutube.com/watch
netstripes.com3 of 565Articlenetstripes.com/facebook-ads-agency-in-australia-meta-ads
alleygroup.com.au3 of 540Articlealleygroup.com.au/acquisition/paid-social-media/meta-agen…
rocketagency.com.au3 of 536Articlerocketagency.com.au/services/social-media-ads-agency/face…
reformdigital.com.au3 of 534Articlereformdigital.com.au/services/social-media-advertising/fa…
facebook.com2 of 5100Own sitefacebook.com
agencies.semrush.com2 of 565Articleagencies.semrush.com/list/facebook-advertising/melbourne
themanifest.com2 of 565Articlethemanifest.com/au/social-media/facebook/agencies
brightlabs.com.au2 of 559Articlebrightlabs.com.au/services/meta-ads-management
emotedigital.com.au2 of 559Articleemotedigital.com.au/partners/meta
digitalnomadshq.com.au2 of 555Articledigitalnomadshq.com.au/blog/facebook-ads-agency
shoutdigital.com.au2 of 550Articleshoutdigital.com.au/services/social-media-marketing/faceb…
webtonic.io2 of 547Articlewebtonic.io/blog/best-meta-ads-fb-ig-agencies-brisbane
impressive.com.au2 of 543Articleimpressive.com.au/facebook-ads

Local SEO services, Austin TX

Median site

50

Bar

39

Content share

88%

Tested site

9

Editorial verdict, as of 2026-10-02: Contested. The median cited site scores 50 and the bar is 39. Content share is 88%.

Content share is the share of cited sources that were articles about the category (88% here), and a vendor's own page does not count. A tested site scored 9 against a bar of 39. It cleared the bar on 0 of 5 questions, and on 0 of 5 questions a site below the bar was cited anyway.

Get quoted in the roundups and city guides the engines already cite. Articles about the category make up 88% of the cited sources.

74 domains were cited across the 5 questions; these are the most-cited, each with one page the engines read.

DomainCited onScoreTypeA page they cited
youtube.com4 of 5100Articleyoutube.com/watch
agencies.semrush.com4 of 565Articleagencies.semrush.com/list/seo/austin
coalitiontechnologies.com4 of 554Articlecoalitiontechnologies.com/austin-seo
geekpoweredstudios.com4 of 553Articlegeekpoweredstudios.com/seo-services
theomnishot.com4 of 549Articletheomnishot.com/best-austin-seo-companies
loopexdigital.com4 of 544Articleloopexdigital.com/blog/best-seo-companies-for-austin-mark…
linkedin.com3 of 599Articlelinkedin.com/pulse/12-best-seo-agencies-small-businesses-…
reddit.com3 of 595Articlereddit.com/r/askaustin/comments/1rok299/looking_for_a_loc…
clutch.co3 of 584Articleclutch.co/seo-firms/austin
designrush.com3 of 581Articledesignrush.com/agency/search-engine-optimization/texas/au…
goodfirms.co3 of 579Articlegoodfirms.co/seo-agencies/austin
thriveagency.com3 of 569Articlethriveagency.com/austin-seo-company
builtinaustin.com3 of 566Articlebuiltinaustin.com/companies/type/seo-companies
direction.com3 of 552Articledirection.com/seo-austin-tx
nextbraintech.com3 of 548Articlenextbraintech.com/texas/seo-company-austin-tx

Caveats

  • Each niche row has 4 questions and is directional.
  • The entry bar in this category runs from 32 to 95. The top of that range comes from a single niche with 4 questions.
  • The niche study used one run per question, and repeat runs overlap about 30%. The labels are automated, 5% of citations are left out of the bars, and the authority ceiling is 45.

Check your own business

The free audit shows whether AI engines can find and recommend your site.

Run the free auditAI Search Visibility for Marketing Teams