Research

Which Professional Services Firms Does AI Recommend?

Small firms' own sites take 51% of citations across 7 niches and 2 markets, and established vendors take 37%. That is 38 questions in total.

Niches and markets

9

Questions asked

38

First-party share

51%

Third-party share

5%

Entry bar range

24 to 53

Markets mostly third-party

1 of 2

Niches in this category

NicheDepthCitationsFirst-partyThird-partyBarMedian siteCited examples
Commercial real estate appraisers4 questions, directional6151%2%2448boweryvaluation.com, losangelescommercialappraisal.com, appraisalinstitute.org, yelp.com
Estate planning attorneys4 questions, directional6157%3%4051carolinaestateplan.com, peckritchey.com, bestlawyers.com, yelp.com
Medical billing services4 questions, directional6062%2%3745ams-solutions.com, medicalbillingrates.com, medicalbillersandcoders.com, goodfirms.co
Equipment financing brokers4 questions, directional7141%7%5354gen-cap.com, ileasecapital.com, crestcapital.com, nerdwallet.com
Executive search firms4 questions, directional5362%6%2650talentfoot.com, shortlistreport.com, huntscanlon.com, forbes.com
Tax resolution services4 questions, directional6133%8%4665solvable.com, arise.tax, jacksonhewitt.com, cnbc.com
Commercial insurance brokers4 questions, directional5454%9%4545allenthomasgroup.com, biberk.com, alliant.com, nerdwallet.com

Each niche has 4 questions, so rows are directional.

Who gets cited

Firms' own sites take 51% of citations. Established vendors take 37%, and third-party sources take 5%, including publishers such as nerdwallet.com and forbes.com and the review site yelp.com. Forums and social take 2%.

The two professional services markets in the market study, personal injury firms and fractional CFO, lean on directories and community. Content share is 80 percent or more in 1 of the 2, which makes that one mostly third-party content.

TypeShare of citationsCited examples
Small providers' own sites51%solvable.com (3 of 28), talentfoot.com (3 of 28), shortlistreport.com (2 of 28), allenthomasgroup.com (2 of 28), carolinaestateplan.com (2 of 28)
Established vendors and marketplaces37%jacksonhewitt.com (4 of 28), crestcapital.com (3 of 28), alliant.com (3 of 28), insureon.com (3 of 28), medicalbillersandcoders.com (3 of 28)
Review sites1%yelp.com (2 of 28), goodfirms.co (1 of 28)
Publishers and guides5%nerdwallet.com (4 of 28), forbes.com (4 of 28), cnbc.com (3 of 28), investopedia.com (2 of 28), usnews.com (2 of 28)
Forums and social2%facebook.com (3 of 28), reddit.com (3 of 28), youtube.com (1 of 28)

First-party and third-party citations by question type

Pooled, own-site share is 32% on general questions and 71% on specific ones. ChatGPT shows 32% against 84%, and Google shows 32% against 64%. The share is much higher on specific questions than on general ones.

Question typeQuestionsCitationsFirst-partyThird-partyChatGPT first-partyGoogle organic first-party
General1421832%9%32%32%
Specific1420371%2%84%64%
Both engines2842151%5%55%48%

What to do first

  • Write service pages for the specific case: a fee model, a client type or a situation. Own-site share is 71% on specific questions, against 32% on general ones.
  • Claim your directory and review profiles (yelp.com).
  • Get quoted in the publishers that appear (nerdwallet.com, forbes.com).
  • Answer questions on Reddit and on social profiles.

Own pages get cited here, so the next step is to score a page with the free AEO checker on how easily an engine can quote it.

Markets from the 14-market study

Personal injury law firms

Median site

41

Bar

31

Content share

67%

Tested site

23

Editorial verdict, as of 2026-10-02: Contested. The median cited site scores 41 and the bar is 31. Content share is 67%. The cited set is built from explainers and directory profiles, and individual firms are quoted directly too.

Content share is the share of cited sources that were articles about the category (67% here), and a vendor's own page does not count. A tested site scored 23 against a bar of 31. It cleared the bar on 0 of 5 questions, and on 5 of 5 questions a site below the bar was cited anyway.

Build the practice-area and state-specific explainers the engines quote, and claim your directory profiles. At this floor both are reachable.

66 domains were cited across the 5 questions; these are the most-cited, each with one page the engines read.

DomainCited onScoreTypeA page they cited
phxinjurylaw.com5 of 542Own sitephxinjurylaw.com
justia.com4 of 582Articlejustia.com/lawyers/personal-injury/arizona/phoenix
attorneys.superlawyers.com4 of 551Articleattorneys.superlawyers.com/personal-injury-plaintiff/ariz…
1800theeagle.com4 of 547Article1800theeagle.com/locations/east-phoenix
phillipslaw.com4 of 542Own sitephillipslaw.com
ramoslaw.com4 of 539Articleramoslaw.com/phoenix-arizona
knappandroberts.com4 of 534Own siteknappandroberts.com
wyattinjurylaw.com4 of 531Own sitewyattinjurylaw.com
lernerandrowe.com3 of 550Articlelernerandrowe.com/arizona/phoenix
panish.law3 of 546Articlepanish.law/phoenix-personal-injury-attorneys
lambergoodnow.com3 of 544Own sitelambergoodnow.com
mcordova.com3 of 543Own sitemcordova.com
karnsandkarns.com3 of 542Articlekarnsandkarns.com/locations/phoenix-arizona-personal-inju…
garyphillipsaccidentlaw.com3 of 537Own sitegaryphillipsaccidentlaw.com
warforyou.com3 of 535Articlewarforyou.com/locations/arizona/phoenix

Fractional CFO, seed stage

Median site

38

Bar

29

Content share

93%

Tested site

11

Editorial verdict, as of 2026-10-02: Contested. The median cited site scores 38 and the bar is 29. Content share is 93%. A low-volume, reputation-led service still produced a wide cited set.

Content share is the share of cited sources that were articles about the category (93% here), and a vendor's own page does not count. A tested site scored 11 against a bar of 29. It cleared the bar on 0 of 5 questions, and on 3 of 5 questions a site below the bar was cited anyway.

LinkedIn is among the most cited domains here, so publish there under a named person as well as on your own site, and get into the fractional CFO roundups.

109 domains were cited across the 5 questions; these are the most-cited, each with one page the engines read.

DomainCited onScoreTypeA page they cited
youtube.com4 of 5100Articleyoutube.com/watch
linkedin.com4 of 599Articlelinkedin.com/pulse/role-fractional-cfo-should-play-seed-s…
reddit.com3 of 595Articlereddit.com/r/startups/comments/188utwh/affordable_cfo_ser…
mccrackenalliance.com3 of 529Articlemccrackenalliance.com/blog/best-fractional-cfo-companies
quora.com2 of 585Articlequora.com/How-much-does-a-fractional-CFO-cost-vs-full-tim…
paro.ai2 of 548Articleparo.ai/strategic-fractional-cfo-services
kruzeconsulting.com2 of 544Articlekruzeconsulting.com/cfo-silicon-valley
zeni.ai2 of 544Articlezeni.ai/blog/how-much-does-a-fractional-cfo-cost
burklandassociates.com2 of 541Articleburklandassociates.com/services/fractional-cfo
useshiny.com2 of 537Articleuseshiny.com/fractional-cfo
theexpertcfo.com2 of 535Articletheexpertcfo.com/fractional-cfo-for-startups-2
finvisor.com2 of 534Articlefinvisor.com/article/how-much-does-a-fractional-cfo-cost
ecaplabs.com2 of 529Articleecaplabs.com/blogs/best-fractional-cfo-services
cfoadvisors.com2 of 526Articlecfoadvisors.com/blog/2025-pricing-roi-guide_-choosing-the…
instagram.com1 of 5100Articleinstagram.com/elseed

Caveats

  • Each niche row has 4 questions and is directional.
  • The market bars for personal injury and fractional CFO come from a different question count. Read gaps of a few points as noise.
  • The niche study used one run per question, and repeat runs overlap about 30%. The labels are automated, 5% of citations are left out of the bars, and the authority ceiling is 45.

Check your own business

The free audit shows whether AI engines can find and recommend your firm.

Run the free auditAI Visibility for Professional Services